应对2020年的调查
- 组名:行政计划和预算组
- 粘稠液体椅子:Pam灰色
- 讨论日期:7月28日
成员参与:Pam灰色,主持;莎莉戈尔,主持;泰瑞杰拉德,大学的财政服务人员;马丁•Varela管理员;直子Harada管理员;Hyon楚Yi-Baker,教职工代表;Sushini集分类代表;Marivic Burdick分类代表;优雅Lim, 2019 - 2021年财务DASB椅子;Jeffrey Kasprow 2020 - 2021 DASB参议员
客人参与:帕特里克•甘农;Arushi沙玛,2019 - 2020 DASB;参议员皮帕吉普森
问题和回答
问题1:你认为当前的治理系统?请列出。
响应
当前治理系统创造机会以满足和与同事合作,促进所有学生的成功。江南娱乐贴吧官网旨在提供知识和机会讨论校园的各种成分的声音。共同治理本身是信息共享的承诺协助校园和资金分配决策。PBT的(计划和预算团队)提供一个格式的理解和讨论校园资源,包括预算教育决策。机会交换更新和讨论每个程序相关事项。我们最近除了导师支持学生代表(s)
额外的评论
根据以往的校园认证团队访问、共享治理提供了一种方法领域的责任审查和讨论决策影响校园。包含组成声音允许输入从学生、教师、员工和管理员与学生相关的成功。江南娱乐贴吧官网参与式治理是必要的认证。
问题2:什么你认为不适合当前的治理体系呢?请列出。
响应
我们当前的治理系统可能无法提供必要的知识和时间所需要的个人团体投票前审查和讨论信息。许多治理不参加的会议。学生表示通常是强烈的在一个学期的开始。然而,总体表现似乎在财年下降。每减少校园招聘,更少的同事能够志愿者在这些委员会谋得一席。缺乏DASB报告,公开评论议程中最小的成员没有办法通过资源的成员我们甚至喜欢广泛的代表。往往同样的人担任多个委员会/治理系统。表示,有不平等的声音,我们的管理系统并不代表我们的学生人数,尤其是弱势学校委员会。共享治理常常救火,要迅速做出决定。我们需要时间来消化信息,这样我们可以做出更好的决策。 We should be able to schedule our governance meeting well in advance, at least a term in advance and advertise to our general population when our meetings are being held. Maybe we can advertise our public meetings during Senior Staff meetings. Difficulty in having classified staff participation as they do not get released from their duties and workloads are extremely high due to continuous staffing reductions. Reps do not take the time to prepare for upcoming meetings. Often have not read the notes or agenda items. Reps can feel like decisions are being made for them, but at meetings do not participate in discussions. General view that the co-chairs of meetings are tasked with constant outreach, following up, sending reminders, etc. Rather than the intended structure where reps and constituent groups are responsible for attending meetings, communication and being prepared. The gov websites are public, available 24/7, are constantly being updated and contain a vast amount of information. Although the structure is set up for each rep to report back and gather info for agenda items many reps do not engage with their constituency groups. This leads to the sense that decisions are being made in a vacuum, opinions are not asked for, and voices are not being heard. Too many meetings and only one that looks at campuswide decisions. Too silo-ed. VP areas need to talk to each other all the time not just occasionally in a special joint meeting. Present structure allows for those with the loudest voices / most comfortable speaking in a group setting to dominate meetings. If we want equity we have to make sure those who are less comfortable speaking up feel they have the time and the "space" to do so. Such reps may include classified staff and students. Faculty, due to their job, are much more likely to be comfortable speaking in front of groups. Many of the same reps serve year after year which can make for few highly specialized individuals focused on a narrower (dept level) view rather than a broader campus view. Meetings can be combative, confrontational and intimidating. A safe shared space where mutual respect for each other's thoughts and opinions is critical. Reps will not contribute if they feel intimidated.
额外的评论
会议过载。有太多的政府/利益相关者使整个结构的时间和劳动密集型的。在DA有6 x政府团队;3 x的利益相关者;4 x咨询小组;4讨价还价的单位(而不是共享的政府需要时间)。在该地区有许多其他团体如地区预算;ETAC;财务审计;机器人; PGA; Chancellor's staff; Technology Bond projects; the new Bond......There is not enough time in the day for all these meetings. It's clearly to complicated and cumbersome. Will zoom we have a great opportunity to streamline the structure, have more representation and be more transparent.
问题3:在理想的情况下,如何治理组织和流程在De Anza结构吗?江南娱乐手机app下载这项工作在实践中如何?请提供一个总结。
响应
更少的组。一个PBT。从每个区域副总裁代表。澄清角色和职责的代表=与选民沟通;准备,等。会议间隔时间与组成团体咨询和讨论。会议每月一次。变焦会议所以任何人都可以参加,但只有评论路由槽委员会成员。发布时间分类的员工。相互尊重。允许更少的声音/自信代表说在一个安全的环境。 No recording or capturing of chat in zoom meetings. This is very intimidating and can be used in a negative manner to 'call out' those who have differing opinions. This would also be available to the public to be viewed and critiqued for ever. No Brown Act. Very intimidating and would not support the goal of equity.
问题4:你在上面提出的理想结构,如何治理组的成员被选中?请提供一个总结。
响应
由其组成团体和与他们的工作职责。
问题5:所有其他的建议和评论
响应
(没有提交)